ML for Biomedical Scaffolds in AM

Topic Survey
Area Biomedical + ML
Papers (250+ cit) 850+
Total Citations 420,000+
AM Methods Bioprinting, SLA, FDM, SLS
Materials Hydrogels, PCL, PLA, HA, Ti
Applications Bone, Cartilage, Skin, Vascular

Machine learning for biomedical scaffolds combines AI-driven design optimization with additive manufacturing to create patient-specific implants and tissue engineering constructs. ML accelerates the discovery of optimal scaffold architectures, predicts cell-material interactions, and enables real-time bioprinting process control.

Contents
  1. Overview
  2. ML for Scaffold Design
  3. Bioprinting Process Control
  4. Biomaterials Selection
  5. Clinical Applications
  6. Key Papers

Overview

Biomedical scaffolds serve as temporary templates that guide tissue regeneration. The intersection of ML and AM enables personalized scaffolds with optimized porosity, mechanical properties matching native tissue, and controlled degradation rates.

850+
Capstone Papers
50-90%
Optimal Porosity
100-500um
Pore Size Range
R2>0.90
ML Prediction Acc.

ML for Scaffold Design

Lattice Structure Optimization

ML optimizes scaffold architecture for competing requirements: high porosity for cell infiltration vs. mechanical strength for load-bearing.

Design Parameter ML Method Optimization Target
Pore size & distribution Bayesian Optimization Cell infiltration depth
Strut thickness Neural Networks Compressive strength
Porosity gradient Genetic Algorithm Nutrient transport
Surface topology CNN + GAN Cell adhesion
TPMS structures Topology Optimization Stiffness matching

TPMS-Based Scaffolds

Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces (Gyroid, Schwarz-P, Diamond) are increasingly used for scaffolds due to their interconnected porosity and tunable properties.

Bioprinting Process Control

Extrusion-Based Bioprinting

Cell Viability Prediction

Factor Impact on Viability ML Prediction
Shear stress High shear damages cells R2 = 0.92
Nozzle diameter Smaller = more stress R2 = 0.89
Print time Longer = nutrient depletion R2 = 0.85
UV exposure (SLA) DNA damage risk R2 = 0.88

In-Situ Monitoring

Biomaterials Selection

Natural Polymers

Synthetic Polymers

Ceramics & Metals

Clinical Applications

Bone Tissue Engineering

Cartilage Regeneration

Skin & Soft Tissue

Key Papers

3D bioprinting of tissues and organs
Murphy & Atala, Nature Biotechnology, 2014 | Foundational review | 4,200+ citations
Additive manufacturing of biomaterials for bone tissue engineering
Reviews AM methods for bone scaffolds | 2,100+ citations
Machine learning for biomaterials design
ML frameworks for scaffold optimization | 800+ citations
TPMS scaffolds for tissue engineering: Design and mechanical properties
TPMS architecture optimization | 600+ citations

View all capstone papers →